Saturday, March 6, 2010

M1 Garand: The Greatest Gift Ever!

You may or may not remember when I said this a long time ago when I was babbling about firearms…



Another rifle I would dearly love to own is an M1 Garand.

My uncle has one. He should probably gift it to me, as I am his favorite nephew. Sorta.

Anyhoo…I have had Garand fever ever since I started playing Medal of Honor video games and saw the Band of Brothers TV series. The sight of heavy rates of .30 caliber rifle fire tearing German flesh asunder has stuck with me.

I want to do something like that also, except with paper targets. I don’t have a problem with Germans now.

They are cool in my book.




My dad (left) and my uncle (right), at Nha Trang Vietnam, 1966.

Well…My uncle, a Vietnam vet, and therefore cool, gave me something today I have been wanting for a long time. It’s almost as if he read my mind, or this blog, or something. Maybe.

I'm as giddy as a (well-armed) schoolgirl!








It's a Springfield Garand, with a serial number of 1009XXX, indicating November-December 1942 year of manufacture.

The furniture is a little beat up and the finish isn't pretty. I haven't field stripped it yet, as I am of the M16A1/A2 generation...and I don't know how...but I'll learn.

I don't know what the barrel or bore looks like yet, but the exterior metal surfaces have a very nice parkerized finish with no rust or pitting.

It seems to function OK so far as I can tell with my limited knowledge. I can work the bolt, and it goes click when I pull the trigger.

I plan on downloading and printing the Garand manual and learning all I can about this battle rifle. I will also take it to a knowledgeable gunsmith to make sure it is in good working order, because I will be shooting it!

I'm so happy I just might crap the bed tonight.



__________



I pulled the trigger group out. It is numbered D28210-12-SA...I'm assuming an authentic Springfield Armory assembly. It looks like brand new. Very little wear and is very stiff. Had to lube it a little to get the safety to function. Looks good to me!


Upon further field stripping and inspection, the barreled receiver group looks just as good. Entire mechanism appears to be US Govt. issue, with no phony foreign/aftermarket parts. Very little wear. I'd say this rifle was gone through and refurbished at least once by a military armorer, and fired very little.





The mechanicals are in much better condition than the furniture would suggest...which is a great thing, I think, since it will be a shooter. No safe queens in my collection!

Even though it's looked down on by the elite Garand snobs, I will most likely refinish the wood. Or I could always buy new wood and keep the old stuff.

So many decisions....


__________



I researched some proof marks on the Garand stock, and they indicate that the stock was made somewhere from June 1953 to June 1957. During that time frame, Springfield made rifles with serial numbers between 4,320,000 to 6,099,905.



Stamps used to make proof marks (Photo courtesy Fulton Armory)

If you remember, my rifle's serial number is 1,009,XXX...indicating that the wood and the upper receiver are not original. This is more common than not, seeing as these rifles were retrofitted and repaired, usually more than once, during their service life.

Even though these facts probably lessen the value of my rifle, it doesn't matter to me, but it would to a snot nosed and snobby elite Garand collector geek...and there are a lot of those types of people out there these days.


__________


Get this...

My 16-year-old son, a firearms fanatic also, said I should put one of these on my Garand!



(Eotech Photo)

I think not.


I laughed heartily and ridiculed him and said, "Oh no! I can't hit the target without a pretty red laser dot showing me where I'm aiming. Iron sights are too difficult to figure out."


He has played too many video games, and I am a bad and unfeeling dad.



__________



Looking closely at the barrel near the front sight, I found "ARL ORD ARLINGTON VA."


A little intardnets searching reveals Arlington Ordnance was a company that imported old original GI M1 Garand and carbine barrels from Korea back in the Reagan era, and then refurbished them.

I saw a few folks on the 'net saying good things about "arsenal rebuilt" Arlington Ordnance barrels, but I don't know.

On another internet site, I was describing my Garand. A battle hardened and crusty Marine asked me what the "barrel date" was.

I had to ask, "How does a pogue reservist poseur such as myself determine barrel date?"

His reply, "If you pull the operating rod back, the date should be on the right side of the barrel, in the general vicinity of the space previously occupied by the op rod.
"

So...I did all this, and found "1SA4 45" and then further up where the barrel necks down there is a "P" ....

Therefore, using my ultra-secret Garand date-code decoding manual, I can assume it's a Springfield Armory barrel dated April 1945!

Awesome!



__________



I had a guy see the picture of the trigger group, and he says it's late WW2 or Korean war vintage.

Not that it matters to me, but it's turning out that the rifle is what the Garand dorks call a "mixmaster"...assembled from a collection of serviceable parts. Again...not uncommon after a 30 year service life, and perfectly fine for a "shooter"...a firearm used for recreation, and not stored in a safe for collector value.

Believe me...I ain't knockin' the rifle. I couldn't be more pleased that my uncle thought enough of me to give it to me.

It means a lot.



__________


I have read where the receivers and barrels of Garands were sometimes retrieved from the trash after "de-milling." De-milling involved cutting the parts into pieces and making them un-usable. Well...seems some unsavory characters would weld the pieces back together and grind out the weld seams and then re-sell the parts.


A cut and re-welded M1 Garand receiver before the weld was ground out. This is extremely nasty and heinous! (Photo courtesy Garand Collectors Association)



A cut and re-welded M1 Garand receiver after "dressing up" the weld location. Horrific! (Photo courtesy Garand Collectors Association)

I'm happy to report that this rifle bears no evidence of having a re-welded receiver or barrel. It all looks solid and new.


__________


I have just discovered that my Garand is equipped with a National Match operating rod, part # 7790722-RA.

Any fool knows that a National Match operating rod, made by Remington Arms, is way more better than a regular old run-of-the-mill and shitty government issue operating rod, because it was "manufactured with a slight clockwise twist to hold them more snugly against the bolt ear, and was used on National Match rifles after 1962 as well as on armory rebuilds throughout the sixties."

No shit.

I am aroused.

More later as I discover it.



__________

I have decided, much to the chagrin and horror of the Garand snobs, to try my hand at refinishing the walnut "furniture" on my beloved M1.

This is what she looks like...stripped of all her metal parts...in all her naked walnut glory.



I scrubbed her down in the bath-tub in warm soapy water. Then, I gave her another vigorous once-over with a stiff bristled brush and Bar Keeper's Friend.

Very sexy...

She likes it like that.

She is a dirty whore.

I need a smoke.


__________


In the process of refinishing the walnut on my vintage M1 Garand battle rifle. One coat of Minwax Dark Walnut stain applied. Will apply another coat in 4 hours. New Castle Brown Ale for me in the interim.



__________


I have been told that it is not unusual for walnut to vary in shade as it is finished, and I'm beginning to see how the walnut is reacting.

The various pieces, the stock and 2-piece hand-guards, don't match exactly...close enough for me...but it looks good for 60 year-old wood...lots of "character."

I have three applications of hand-rubbed oil-based stain on the stock now. I should probably quit messing with it.

My plan is to let it cure for a week, then apply the satin poly clear coat...(it is not glossy)...which is known to give the finish a slight amber tint.

It should look very sexy when I'm done. It will make my uncle smile and maybe even drool a little, and he will want the rifle back.

We'll have to negotiate on that!

__________


It is (re) finished! I am kinda aroused and stuff because it is the most beautifulest thing I have ever created with my own human hands.

I may openly weep too.

Or something.

Maybe.





__________


I've wanted a Garand for a long time, and having my uncle give me his was quite unexpected. I figured I'd have to wait until he croaked to get it! Fortunately, such was not the case.

I'm going to see him at our family gathering on Easter, and he has said he would like me to bring the Garand so he can check it out and all I've done to it.

He acted like we should keep things on the down-low at the Easter gathering while he inspected the rifle, and I said, "Fuck that!
Are you kidding? We're going to do close order drill up and down the county roads. Then, we will BZO it. Nothing says "Easter" like 30.06!"

As far as accessorizing my Garand is concerned, I'm not gonna go ape-shit. I've ordered a cheap Chinese-made padded cotton carrying case thingy, and a 5-pack of US-made en-bloc clips from Cheaper Than Dirt.




I'm happy with the olive drab web sling that came with the rifle, as it is just like the ones I'm familiar with when I humped my M16 as a part-time nasty Marine pogue reservist puke. I can configure a hasty loop sling just like I did at the range, and get on target fairly fast using what I learned back in the day.


No leather slings for me. Not my bag, baby.

A few other things to get might be an ammo belt...not real important to me...and maybe one of those adjustable gas plugs, 'cuz I don't wanna batter the crap outta my baby...



And ammo...lots of it. Might have to go the CMP Greek route, seeing as the commercial version is pretty expensive.

I had been looking at those Ram-Line synthetic stocks...a very cool alternative to wood I think, and I was seriously considering going that route if the refinishing on my furniture went awry.




Anyhoo... I'm pretty proud of the old gal, but I'm thinking I like this vintage battle rifle refinishing thing. Fun stuff...

A Mosin-Nagant next?


__________


Thought I’d update you all on the Garand unveiling at my family’s Easter gathering…

So, my uncle and I walk over to my van, and I slide Ms. G.A. Rand from her new padded carrying case. Uncle oohs and ahhs at her marvelous beauty, and is duly impressed. We talk about manly stuff like ammo, sip our beers, and we scratch and grunt a lot.


Then, my sister’s father in-law strolls up, similarly drools, tells me of his Army service and his familiarity with the M1, and asks to hold the star of the party.


I hand him the rifle, and I ask him what he thinks.


He gets a gleam in his eye, comes down smartly to an order-arms position, and proceeds to go all “Silent Drill Team” with my girl! He slams her pristine parkerized butt-plate on the asphalt deck a couple of times, then gives the butt-stock a couple of sideways kicks and starts into his “twirling rifles” routine.




At this point in the show, I’d had about enough. Nobody was going to treat my gal like the filthy whore she is…except me…so I said, “Dude! Man! I just spent a month cleaning up and refinishing that rifle! Hows about we stop these shenanigans?”

He ceased his silly and abusive activities, and handed the rifle back to me.


He don’t know how lucky he is.


I was about to go ruckus on him, but seeing as I am a man of peace…like Mandela or Gandhi…and that it was Easter Sunday, I controlled myself.


It was a fun day.

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Daddy Needs A New Pistol: An Exercise In Futility

In looking for informed ideas on a new sidearm, I asked some experienced and combat-tested Marines and Navy Corpsmen their opinions on the matter at a private internet site. The exchange got very interesting, heated, humorous, and profane, and I thought I’d present to you, my valued readers, a somewhat one-sided view of the entire mess.

9-11-2009

Because I'm so fucking good, I'm gonna get me some free bonus money from work.

Thinking about getting a Glock, because my sidearms, although totally serviceable, are antique as fuck, and I'd like to get something modern and higher-capacity to shoot zombies with.

If my mommy will let me, the above is the plan.

Or, should I just shut the fuck up and play Counterstrike because it is safer?

(SIG suggestion)


Two-toned firearms are imprudent and improper, and I don't like all the notches, harsh angles, and rail attachment thingies either.

(slingshot suggestion)


Too difficult to carry concealed. Tactical holster availability non-existent. Ammo prohibitively expensive.

(FNH P40 or P45 suggestion)


Not bad, but notchy thangs on lower would be a concern.

(taser suggestion)


Won't draw blood or make heads explode. No loud and awesome report when fired. Little to no intimidation factor. Rarely lethal.

(Llama Mini-Mag .45 suggestion)
(High Standard 1911 suggestion)


I already have a 1911....a REAL one...a GI Colt, circa 1945, in great shape. Why would I want a cheap knock-off?

(C71 with attachments suggestion)


What's all that shit hanging off of it?

I hate accessories.

Keep it simple.

Trigger well is big enough for fucking Mickey Mouse to stick his entire gawdamn hand in there.

Does it come with the quilt? It is quite lovely!

(H&K USP .45 suggestion)


Not bad...even though it looks a little bloated and trigger well is big enough for mitten hand.

I don't want to get something so outrageously exotic that it's impossible to find reasonably priced holsters for it.

I want something that isn't a safe queen and won't break the budget to plink with.

Ammo price and availability a big factor also....In addition, it should be apparent that I don't care for the Arnold Schwarzenegger/Terminator bloated steroid looking shit that's out there now...

Practical, proven, reliable, rugged, simple, economical...kinda like me! (sounding more and more like a Glock)

(Glock 19 in OD green suggestion)


Maybe the black one, but OD is gay.

(Luger suggestion)


I don't want a fucking Nazi-ass Luger either. Fuckin' things go off all by themselves and kill GIs like in Band o' Brudders.

(put your bonus money into a 529 for your kid(s) and stop being so selfish suggestion)

Fuck 'em. I've paid for everything else up to this point. Where is it written I must pay for their college? If they want it bad enough, they'll figure out a way to work for it.

Daddy needs a new boomstick.

…besides, Obama's gonna take care of the free college thang anyways.

9-15-2009

Just returned from my local gun store.

I finger fucked a new metal framed Cz75 9mm, new S&Ws M+P 9mm and .40, and a used Glock .40.

The CZ was a really nice gun, fit and finish great, and sexy lines, but too heavy for what I want.


The used Glock .40 is a police turn-in. It is light, fits my hands good. Price is right, but it didn't arouse me too much for some reason.

The Smith & Wessons MPs were a real surprise. I fell in love quickly, even though it has notchy things on it. It fits my hands great, and is comfortable and natural to hold. I think I just might go for the SW MP .40!


Further research indicates certain S&W semi-auto products to be sucky. Nevermind…

9-20-2009

It will be a Glock 23 or a Smith M+P .40.

I will make my final decision when I go into my local gun store next week and put it in lay-away.

I will post copious amounts of images of my new firearm purchase.

9-22-2009

I ordered a new Glock23 today.

Cash and a vintage Winchester Model 24 sealed the deal.

Cool.


The M24 had been refinished, had a small crack in the stock, and a removable rubber pad on the butt which discolored the wood underneath a little.

The bores were shiny and not pitted.

I've had it for 10 years and never fired it.

I'm not really into shotguns.

It belonged to a late great uncle, who I barely knew, so it didn't mean a whole lot to me like the firearms my grandfathers, my late father, and my uncles owned.

I let it go for $300. A guy who pheasant hunts bought it.


_____


Some of my other handguns...



The upper wheelgun is a piece of shit High Standard .22 model 21s. Fun for my boys to plink with.

The 1911 is a GI Colt, manufactured in 1945. Original grips were plastic, but I replaced them with the Pachmayrs pictured.

The Smith .38 snubbie is an antique M+P. My late old man acquired it from his police buddies to carry because he made a few unsavory enemies whilst a reporter for the Indianapolis Star newspaper.

Dad received his fair share of death threats due to his investigative reporting.

In fact, one shit-bird he helped convict disarmed a guard and escaped custody while getting some medical treatment at a local hospital.

Shit-bird had ripped a page out of a telephone book with our address on it, and was on his way to our family home with plans to tie Dad up, then shoot me, my brother, my two sisters, and my mom...all while he forced my dad to watch!

Fortunately for us, shit-bird was nabbed by observant cops, just a few miles from our house, before the heinous deed could be done.

true story...

_____

9-26-2009

My new toy!


Now I need to take it to the range and give it a test run.

I'll give you a full report with pics.

9-30-2009

Regarding my new Gock23...I have spent some quality time with it already...practicing emergency stoppage correction drills, and field stripping it and reassembling it under the covers blindfolded with the lights out at night wearing mittens while being talked to sternly by my old lady.

Soon, I think I will give my new Glock a good cleaning and talk to it lovingly for a while.

Next, I need to purchase a suitable home in which it will reside while I carry it.

This holster must be a warm, comfortable, inviting, and safe place for it to live.

I'm thinking one of those Fobus or Blackhawk paddle holster things would be a good starter home for my new toy.

As a solid foundation for my new Glock's home, I have already ordered one of those Wilderness Tactical Frequent Flyer belts.

Yes. I will look like a Gun Shop/Range commando before too long.

Finally, I will take my new Glock to the range very soon and thrash the dog snot out of it.

Initially, my new Glock will probably be thinking, "WTF?" after being treated so nice for so long.

Then, it will remember that it is a dirty filthy whore that can withstand all kind of unsavory abuse.

My new Glock needs a name. I think I will call it Barack.

Yes! Barack the Glock! Brilliant!

As a side note...I took my oldest son, 16, with me the day I picked up Barack the Glock from the gun store. On the shelf was a beautiful Mosin Nagant.


For those of you ignorant and/or afraid of firearms, a Mosin Nagant is is a bolt-action, internal magazine fed, military rifle that was used by the armed forces of the Russian Empire, the Soviet Union and various other nations, most of them from Eastern bloc.

The Commies musta made eleven trillion of them.

Anyhoo, the one at the gun store was marked $159.

My kid was all excited when he saw it and that he could afford it with the birthday money he recently received.

I told him I would allow him to buy it if he wanted it.

Am I a bad dad for allowing my son to purchase a vintage Soviet battle rifle?

10-18-2009

BTW...here's a shot of my Glock and its new carry rig.

Fobus paddle holster on the Wilderness Tactical Frequent Flyer belt. Seems to be a pretty nice, comfortable, and versatile setup for civvie puke carry...concealed or not.


_____



10-31-2009

In order to justify owning a handgun, some of you may be asking, "....where is it you live that is so wild? I am not asking for a specific locale. Just how far are you from any real crime?"

I live in Indy.

It's not really wild, like in Dee-troit wild, but enough stoopid shit goes down here, and I'm up and about at the retarded hours due to my job when assholes want to try to jack a fool.

Last week I woke to cops and K9s in my back yard due to a prowler/sex creep call a couple of doors down.

A few years ago, a local city cop was shot and killed by a crackhead a few blocks from my crib.

Homes/garages are getting burgled on my street.

Shit can happen anywhere, man.

I don't flash, pose, or look to go all Death Wish on motherfuckers.

But... I'm not gonna lay down and give up my hard earned shit for anybody, and I sure as fuck ain't gonna stand by while a bitch tries to hurt my family.


_____

http://www.snubnose.info/wordpress/rkba/i-dont-carry-a-gun/


I don't carry a gun to kill people.

I carry a gun to keep from being killed.

I don’t carry a gun to scare people.

I carry a gun because sometimes this world can be a scary place.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m paranoid.

I carry a gun because there are real threats in the world.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m evil.

I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the world.

I don’t carry a gun because I hate the government.

I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m angry.

I carry a gun so that I don’t have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.

I don’t carry a gun because my sex organs are too small.

I carry a gun because I want to continue to use those sex organs for the purpose for which they were intended for a good long time to come.

I don’t carry a gun because I want to shoot someone.

I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed, and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

I don’t carry a gun because I’m a cowboy.

I carry a gun because, when I die and go to heaven, I want to be a cowboy.

I don’t carry a gun to make me feel like a man.

I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.

I don’t carry a gun because I feel inadequate.

I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.

I don’t carry a gun because I love it.

I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.


_____


Why The Gun is Civilized

By Marko Kloos

Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force.

If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force.

Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.

In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion.

Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.

When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force.

The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100 pound woman on equal footing with a 220 pound mugger, a 75 year old retiree on equal footing with a 19 year old gang banger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a car load of drunken guys with baseball bats.

The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.

There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a (armed) mugger to do his job.

That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed, either by choice or legislative fiat—it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed.

People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society.

A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.

Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways.

Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser.

People who think that fists, bats, sticks or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV.

There, people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst.

The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker.

If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weight lifter.

It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.

When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I’m looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded.

I don’t carry because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid.

It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation….. And that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.


_____

11-19-2009

I bought some ammo, and I'm gonna buy some more wif my birfday card money.

Might go to the range Saturday if I can squeeze it into my busy social calendar.


11-21-2009

Range time today. Taking my sons also. The Glock will be my bitch. A full 6-8 page report with opinions, photos, and a works cited page to follow.


Just got back from the range.

A good and safe time was had by all.

My first impressions of my new Glock23?

I need more practice.

Lots of it.

The Glock is a new world for me, as I am accustomed mostly to my Colt 1911 .45, and my little S&W 39-2 9mm.

The Glock23 is as advertised by many. “Snappy” is an accurate description, and accurate I wasn’t…at least not like I’d like to be.

My sons and I put 400 rounds through it today. We shot 100 rounds of Winchester “white box” 165 grain FMJ ball ammo, and 300 rounds of Federal 180 grain FMJ ball ammo.

With my share of the ammo, I had no failures with the pistol.

My oldest son had one failure-to-extract immediately after I warned him of the gun’s propensity to do so when being “limp wristed.”

My younger son had one failure-to-feed. Again…due to a suspected “limp wristing” of the gun.

Truthfully, my sons shot the pistol better than I did.

Must be those young eyes...and excellent coaching!


Here she is after being treated like the dirty filthy stinking trollop she is! Note the scorch marks and brass residue.

Tuesday, October 6, 2009

Who Is Mario Bauer, and Why Won't He Cite His Sources?

(Indpls Times)

(UPI)


(Indpls Times)


Bumping around the intardnets the other day, I discovered a South American (I believe) auto racing blog website.

In it, I found several photographs that looked eerily familiar to me.

Upon further investigation, I deemed these exact images to have been “borrowed” from my Picasa nostalgic racing photos site.

Naturally, I confronted the author responsible, Mario Bauer. Admittedly, having dealt with this type of situation several times in the past, my tone was rather accusatory, ...firm but fair, in my opinion.

Since that time, several things have happened.

-Mr. Bauer has removed the images in question, (which was never my intent), effectively eliminating the evidence in this instance.
-Mr. Bauer has blocked me from commenting on his blog.
-Mr. Bauer has removed all public comments I made on his blog.
-I discovered a second post on his blog, where Mr. Bauer uses yet another exact image from my Picasa site…again, without citing his source. (I will reveal my evidence in this case later.)

He says he has never heard of me, and has never taken any images from my Picasa site.

I don’t believe him for a minute.

The following are pieces of the discussions I’ve had with Mr. Bauer, and others, via the intardnets.

I do not have the exact wording of the messages I left on Mr. Bauer’s blog site, because he deleted them all.

If he wishes to provide me with them, I will post them here.


_____


This was Mr. Bauer’s initial unedited reaction to me confronting him about the images in the first blog entry I discovered:

you probably didn't read the disclaimer, to be found at the ABOUT THIS BLOG
section. This post is more than two years old, I really can't tell where these
pictures very taken from.

I doubt very much that they have been "lifted" by myself from a source with
clear copyright indication, as you you seem to suggest. Simply because I DO ask
for permission first, if the picrtures are copyright protected. That's also
clearly stated in the disclaimer.

However, if you'd like to indicate the source and wish to be noted as copyright
holder, I will definitely correct this. You mentioned you got them in a Picasa
album, but you haven't actually made clear if you are the copyright holder.

By the way: Did you know that you pass on your copyrights to the site owners as
soon as you publish something in Facebook, MySpace, Picasa, etcetc...?

However, I'm awaiting your instructions on what I should do to remedy the
situation, OK


This is his second response, unedited, after I asked him if he put the story together, and his source for the images:


Yes I didi put the story together and especially from US motorsport I got a huge file with hundreds of photos that were made available in a forum. I think it wasAtlas, or so. So if there's a picture and no credit, how would possibly know where it is from? Just for the record: In the link you just provided tghere's a difierent credit to the picture. It says "UPI PHOTO, photographer unknown" So what's the real deal then? You can't claim copyright of a picture that belongssto an agency and been taken by someone else. I'm REALLY confused now!

This is Mr. Bauer’s third response to me, again, unedited, after I drew his attention to the disclaimer at my Picasa site:


None of the pictures in my blog have ever been taken from your "Picasa photo
album", I didn't even have any knowledge of your personal webspace till you drew
my attention to it today.

Furthermore you're clearly neither the photographer, so you do NOT
own the intellectual property to these pictures, nor do you seem to
have acquired the copyrights yourself. So far I cannot see on what grounds you
claim to eligible for a credit of those pictures.

Should you have any proof you actually do own the copyrights of these pictures,
please do come forward with adequate proof. In that case I will be more than
happy to review this.

This is my exact response to the above message from Mr. Bauer. I could feel the whole situation turning slightly ugly, so I saved my response as a Word document:

I never claimed I owned the copyright to the pictures not taken by my father, a reporter and photographer. The photos my father took are indeed my property, because he willed them to me at the time of his death, and because I am in possession of the original negatives. (My father kept all the negatives of only the photos HE took.)

In regards to the picture of Fangio at Indy and the Jimmy Bryan "no hands" picture, I'm claiming that they WERE lifted from one of my sites at some point by someone, because, as far as I've been able to discern, none of them had been seen publicly in 50 years (if at all), or especially on the internet, until I scanned the original prints and made them available.

It is possible my father took the images in question, because he was at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway at that time, but, because I do not have the original negatives, or any other proof of the images' sources, I credited the applicable news service printed on the back of each. Additionally, if I had no evidence at all of the image source, I stated "photographer unknown," just to keep things on the up and up.

I would think you would do as much.

I'm not asking for the world. The possibility that those images were originally gleaned from somewhere other than my websites is EXTREMELY remote.

All I'm doing is pointing out where they most likely came from. There's no doubt in my mind where they came from.

What kind of proof do you need?

I've dealt with this kind of thing since I made the photos public following my father's death in 2002...usually in places like Atlas (I infrequently post there as "Walter Zoomie"), where racing nostalgia is discussed, and I've found that people accommodate my wishes that some kind a credit is given, most importantly, to my father.

He could have shit-canned the entire collection of images, and he actually considered doing so until I expressed an interest in them shortly before his death.

My goal in making these images public was to do so as a sort of tribute to him, not for my own fame or fortune, and it has been something I oftentimes regret doing.

I am not one to "lawyer up." If you can't see your way clear to doing the honorable and decent thing, that's your problem, and we have nothing further to discuss.

This is Mr. Bauer’s final, and unedited, response. It was at this point that he removed the images in question, and blocked me from communicating with him:


THE NERVE some people got!
I am always friendly and polite. As long as I’m approached that very same way that is. On the other hand there are time wasters out there you wouldn’t believe.
Yesterday, for the first time in 24 years of journalism, I had someone complaining not having received proper credit for three pictures that had been part of this post. Got me worried at first.
Turns out the photographer of these pics is unknown, even the source is unknown, yet there’s some dude with this „ I found those same shots in my drawer so I should be credited and if you don’t do what just popped up in my mind, you’re not a decent person“ kind of attitude that insisted on me doing something I have no obligation whatsoever to do.
So, Pal, you could have had – nonetheless – a link to your “precious” little site and a note explaining the little story you told me. Be it true or not. That’s not going to happen now.
You should learn to approach people like me as fellow race enthusiasts and competent in what they’re doing. Thanks to your wise ass attitude you got the opposite. Still no credit for you because I’ve removed the darn pictures for good. Not because I accept having done anything wrong. Not at all ! I just feel time is too precious to be wasted on some blown up ego.
Should I find out who REALLY deserves the credit, those pictures WILL be back, credited to whoever is REALLY entitled to such mention.
End of story


_____


The thing is, I've never had a problem with others using the pics on my site. I've donated many of them to various authors and projects (from whom I've never taken a dime), with the only stipulation that my father is given credit for his work, and the other photogs/news agencies be given credit for theirs.

That was all I was asking in this case.

Like I said before, much of these rare images had never been seen before by anyone, and the ones that had been seen (in print media) hadn't been seen by anyone in 50 years.

Because I am a giving and loving sort, kinda like Gandhi or Mandela, I wanted to share these images with the world...for free.

It has been a major pain in the ass for seven years.

I peruse the 'net every now and then to see how much of this stuff is out there without a source being cited, and I frequently get my shorts in a wad about it all.

I'm a dick like that though.

I'm not claiming to have been "damaged."

I'm not claiming copyright to the shit my dad did not take. (I've never tried to sell any of it).

These rare images, some never seen before, would have been lost forever had I not put them on the net.

Some of them were my dads (to which I have rightful ownership), some were not, and I've always notated them accordingly.

Any Journalism 101 student knows to cite his source.

Granted...at the time Mr. Bauer put the article together, he may or may not have been fully aware of the images' source.

However, once the author is apprised of the images' source, he should correct matters...a simple thing to do in the intardnets age.

That's all I'm saying.

Now for some proof...


(Indpls Times)

(UPI)

(Indpls Times)

http://picasaweb.google.com/WalterZoomie/Indianapolis500VintagePhotos1#5160184243811787026

http://picasaweb.google.com/WalterZoomie/Indianapolis500VintagePhotos1#5160184407020544514

http://picasaweb.google.com/WalterZoomie/Indianapolis500VintagePhotos1#5160184424200413746

Seriously...how many people on the planet (besides me) could produce an image like this?

The original prints of three of the four photos in Mr. Bauer’s original story...(now deleted)


The backside of the same three photos...



_____



(Indpls. Times)

Cool. A second post from Mr. Bauer’s blog, and another image from my collection! You can even see the grease pencil crop marks on it. Awesome!

A screen-shot


The Picasa image.


Here's a picture of the original!


And the back...


Enough evidence now?

Mr. Bauer....a simple "UPI Photo from the Rick Johnson/Paul Johnson Collection"...or some such, is all it takes for me to be satisfied that your source has been cited.

Hell...you could delete my name if you want, and no internet link to my site is necessary either.

I understand how disheartening and embarrassing it may be for an experienced journalist of 24 years to be called out by a dumb Yank truck driver.

Regardless, man up and make it right!


_____


The proof must have been overwhelming. Mr. Bauer has removed all photos in question, while at the same time disavowing that the pictures came from my collection.

When asked why it was such a big deal for him to credit his source when it was pointed out to him, this was Mr Bauer's reply:





Talk about pathetic.

I win.